TERRORIST SWAP AND CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS

TERRORIST SWAP AND CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS.
The U.S. A. does not negotiate with terrorists, the president had said, applying a traditional American foreign policy for many years.

When the president received the Nobel Peace Award in Oslo he said: “I face the world as it is, I cannot stand idle in the face of threat to the American people. For make no mistake: evil does exist in the world. A non violent movement could not have halted Hitler ‘arms. Negotiations can not convince terrorist leaders to lay down their arms”

Now on the eve of the most important congressional election in history, the President has changed his mind.
In order to win the majority of congress in November, he persistently violates the law, and arbitrarily changed several traditional administrative regulations on immigration.

Dividing the community is the best system to govern a country. That has been the system the President Obama has used for 6 years.

The negotiation, with Taliban, the terrorist organization which has killed thousands of young American soldiers in Afghanistan, and was a necessary accomplice of Al-Qaeda in the terrorists explosion of the New York World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington, on 9-11-01, killing more than 3.000 innocent American people, has a political objective.
The illegal procedure of the deal is clear. Even the Democrats, his own political party recognize the violation of the Law,

Phony scandals. President Obama accuses critics of the terrorist swap as authors of phony scandals.
The Defense’ Secretary said : “The government does not negotiate with terrorists, it was the government of Qatar which negotiated the prisoner swap.” That statement is not only phony, it is an insult to Americans, considering them ignorant people easy to be deceived
The same day, on Saturday June 31, the President himself said that the swap was an “ironclad commitment to bring our prisoner of war home.”

The security adviser Mrs. Rice, who apparently is treated disrespectfully by the White House, is in charge of transmitting phony news to the public in order to disorient the national opinion, has said : “ Sergeant Bergdahl had served with honor and distinction”. .
Serious information, coming from military sources and the media, has proved Sergeant Bergdahl is considered a military deserter and not a hero, because he irresponsibly abandoned his duties as leader of a Platoon in the middle of the night, an attitude that caused a pending military investigation.
According to information given by TV news channels, it also has been said that he had publically announced being against the war in Afghanistan where he was providing his services, had converted to Islam and had been a collaborator with the Taliban,

Common sense justifies the theory of COOPERATION with the Taliban if we think that it is absolutely impossible that an American soldier would have saved his life wandering in the middle of the night without arms, amid terrorists, if the enemies had not agreed in advance with the plan of the evasion.

ADVICE. Sergeant Bergdahl, as a matter of fact nobody is against your freedom. We only know one side of the coin. You will have the opportunity to refute. My advice for you would be to be honest if the hypothesis of cooperation with the Taliban has any evidence. Tell Americans whether or not you committed a terrible mistake or you were a naive instrument induced by somebody else who had a different plan. Tell Americans if somebody else, either politician or military was involved in the plot, if there was one, that almost cost your life, even if it was done in good faith.

Muslim electorate. Drones vs. Guantanamo. The Muslim community is not satisfied with the Arab president’s policy of using Drones for Killing individual terrorists and non terrorists and their families in non combatant actions. They also believe that the President involuntarily has encouraged the fight between Shiites and Sunnis around the world, mainly in the Middle East as well as in all of Africa,
Some American senators agree with them, and in their debates find a controversial position of the President of whom they said that while the President persists in eliminating the Guantanamo Prison because of attempts against Human Rights, on the other hand he defends and has justified in his presidential term the use of Drones for the killing of Americans suspected of terrorism, without any judicial process.

Immigration reform for elections. Simultaneously with the Taliban deal he has issued several new administrative orders, inciting Mexican parents to bring their children to the United States illegally, granting them benefits, like education, health care and also providing free legal services.

These entire demagogue tricks could backfire for the President and American people, who are not as stupid as President believe, will vote for a republican congress in November.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>