WAS THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS ASSAULT A CONSPIRACY?
Why would a defendant attack a judge who spared his life? Why would Dictator Assad commit a crime dropping chemical weapons on a civil community, affecting the relationship of the two countries-U.S-Syria-, 24 hours after president Trump offered Assad friendship and deposited in his hand the laurels of peace, freeing him from six years of the obsessive President Obama asking him dozens of times to relinquish his job?
David Ignatius wrote in the Washington Post: “Why did Assad use nerve gas in Idlib? It is impossible to know. Maybe…”
Who is going to benefit politically and who is going to suffer the negatives effects of the U.S. bombing of Syria?
Millions of Americans ask themselves this question in the middle of the night because they are scared of saying what they think.
Everything looks as if it was a plot to discredit
Mr. Trump, and Mr. Trump got caught in the trap.
Let’s be real. The fight is between Obama and Trump for the presidency in 2020. To be honest, the Obama campaign is doing better up to now, and he has the advantage that the Trump administration is 95% obamista. Mr. Obama had said that he would have beaten Trump if he had been the candidate in 2016. So now, with that delusional idea, he is preparing to beat Trump in 2020.
Mr. Obama under the new circumstances has gotten what he wanted: make Mr. Trump a participant of the Syria conflict so he can share mutual responsibility in the future; break the relationship between United States and Russia, and between Mr. Trump and Putin; get political power to continue attacking Mr. Putin for supporting President Assad, and for supposedly having intervened in the presidential campaign against the democrats in favor of President Trump.
CHEMICAL WEAPONS.
The government of Mr. Assad, as well as the rebels or Free Syrian Army, sponsored by the Obama government, as was decided in the Tunis convention presided by Hillary Clinton on February 25-2012, both, were blamed for using chemical weapons during this war. The United Nations could not prove it.
The REBELS used chemical weapons?
Reuter News and the foundation Constitutional Right Pac reported in 2014 that it was quite possible that the rebels were the one organization that used chemical weapons, with the intention of accusing the Assad Government as the culprit.
Recently AP told the Washington Post that the disarmament has always been the subject of doubt, and there is evidence that the Islamic State group and other insurgents might have acquired chemical weapons.
The DEAL in Geneva eliminated all chemical weapons from Syria, after the bloody battle when the Rebels took over Aleppo.
RUSSIA was the country directed by Mr. PUTIN that brokered the deal which finally got rid of chemical weapon from Syria, with the participation of the United Nations, U.S. and several countries.
The OBAMA Government got the responsibility of transporting the Chemical weapons out of Syria, and the stock was supposed to be deposited in Afghanistan to be burned.
The United Nations and several organizations have been supervising the deal, and up to April 4, 2017, Syria was never accused formally of using Chemical Weapons, and President Obama personally had affirmed that the chemical weapons were one hundred percent out of Syria after 2014.
Mr. Larry Ward, president of the organization Constitutional Right Pac, wrote in the article, “Stay out of Syria” in 2014: “The intervention in Syria is unconstitutional. At the time that we are told the ISIS threat is everywhere we are told we need to begin air strikes on Syria WHY? Why Syria?”
This is my conclusion from this brief analysis of the war in Syria: Mr. Trump, stay out of Syria.